Real estate agents’ private expense claims drop under Inland Revenue spotlight

Inland Revenue has a focus on areas of the economy where tax is not being paid as it should.

Stuff

Inland Revenue has a focus on areas of the economy where tax is not being paid as it should.

Inland Revenue says putting the spotlight on real estate agents’ incomes has led to fewer private expenses being claimed.

It expanded its “hidden economy” focus – a project of work looking at transactions that are not being disclosed to Inland Revenue, including in areas such as hospitality and the trades – to cover the real estate sector last year.

It was concerned about people understating their income and overstating their expenses, which resulted in them paying less tax than they should.

“Real estate is one area that is booming during Covid and our analysis of the sector suggests real estate agents commonly claim a high level of expenses relative to their income,” spokesperson Richard Owen said at the time.

Inland Revenue’s hidden economy lead, Trevor Jeffries, said now that more than 90% of the expected returns had been filed for 2021, the department had compared the results to earlier tax years.

READ MORE:
* Inland Revenue targets cheating real estate agents
* ‘Merry-go-round’ of fiscal deception nets $ 344k for Hamilton siblings
* New $ 1.6 billion IRD system got tax calculation wrong, says accountant

“What the analysis tells us is that the trend we identified of increasing private expenses being claimed has been reversed and we are now seeing less private expenditure being claimed,” Jeffries said.

Inland Revenue started the campaign because a number of real estate agents appeared to be claiming private expenses against their business income, or claiming expenses without supporting business records, paying GST on net income rather than gross, and not including wage subsidy payments with their annual tax returns.

“IR has monitored and reviewed 2021 tax returns that fell outside industry norms. Common errors include claims for gifts, personal clothing and grooming, meals, and entertainment expenses, alongside issues such as calculation of home office and vehicle expenses,” Jeffries said.

“Another common error was the underreporting of income for GST purposes, where customers incorrectly used the net amount deposited to their bank account as income for GST purposes.

“If we are concerned that someone has overclaimed expenses, they will receive a letter from us requesting they prove the expenses claimed. That ‘proof’ can include things like bank statements, invoices, a logbook, and any other information to confirm the expense is deductible.

“Only a small number have been referred for audit action. Prosecution is an option of last resort.”

Chris McKeen / Stuff

Tax consultant Terry Baucher says Inland Revenue is starting to crack down on inappropriate use of trusts and companies.

Jeffries said real estate agents were aware of the campaign.

“We have had tremendous support from real estate firms and continue to work with them to support their agents. Our online and live webinars have proved a hit and we have been encouraged by the engagement and questions that flow from these sessions.

“Our expectation is that agents should now be well aware of the common errors and how to file correct returns. However, we will continue to use our data analytics to monitor 2022 returns as they are filed, and where necessary we will take the appropriate enforcement action.

“Our approach is to raise awareness and self-help materials first. We would far rather encourage customers to do the right thing from the start. So, we recommend people approach us before we contact them.”

Deloitte tax partner Robyn Walker said it was possibly one of the most high-profile examples of the Inland Revenue putting its new data analytical powers to use.

”Inland Revenue essentially established that there were high levels of business expenses being claimed by some real estate agents relative to their income levels – much higher than other sectors. Inland Revenue has been proactively ‘educating’ the sector on what is an appropriate business expense to be claiming and the latest release indicates this has been a success, ”she said.

“One of the key issues the self-employed need to navigate is the boundary between what is a business expense and what is a personal expense; as a general rule costs of clothing, grooming, meals and other entertainment are often not deductible and there are limitations on how many home office and vehicle expenses can be claimed. ”

Leave a Comment